Main authors: Lúcia Barão and Gottlieb Basch
Editor: Jane Brandt
Source document: Barão, L. and Basch, G. (2017) Identification of parameter/indicator set for testing and evaluating the impact on soil quality and crop production parameters. iSQAPER Project Milestone 6.2 29 pp

 

In this article we describe the range of pedo-climatic zones and farming systems within which the 138 paired control/AMP experimental plots that were used in the 2016 field campaign were located. We give the criteria we used to select a subset of 20 plots for an extended visual soil and assessment and measurement of additional soil properties in 2018.


Contents table
1. Distribution of experimental sites using innovative AMPs by climatic region
2. Farming systems used in experimental sites
3. Soil types in the experimental sites
4. Innovative AMPs identified in the experimental sites
5. Soil threats
6. Criterial for selection of experimental sites
7. Final selection of experimental sites

1. Distribution of experimental sites using innovative AMPs by climatic region

In Europe, only the case study sites in the De Peel (Netherlands) and Argentré du Plessis (France) were not able to identify plots according to the requested variability. That was mainly due to the absence of different soil types in the region and the predominance of Anthrosols. The rest of the European case study sites identified the plots with the requested variability in the farming systems, soil types and AMPs and their corresponding control plots.

In China, each case study site was only able to identify 6 or 7 plots/farms. While there was still some variability on the soil type, the majority of the farming systems identified in the plots/farms was Arable land.

A total of 138 plots/farms using innovative AMPs was identified: 112 in Europe and 26 in China. In Europe the sites covered six of the eight climatic regions. Some of the plots/farms identified in SE Spain (Spain) were located not only in the Mediterranean Temperate region but also in the Semi-Arid Mediterranean region. Trzebieszów (Poland) covered two climatic regions at the same time, with some plots/farms located in the Northern Sub-Continental region and others in the Southern Sub-Continental region (Figure 4). In China, the plots were distributed across three climatic regions.

MS6.1 fig04
Figure 4
MS6.1 fig05
Figure 5

2. Farming systems used in experimental sites

In Europe the most frequent farming system in the experimental sites was Arable land (63%) followed by Permanent crops (23%) and Pastures (14%). In China, however the great majority of the siteswere Arable Land (92%) and only 4% for Permanent crops and 4% for Pastures.

The relative distribution of farming systems within each case study site was very variable. As an example, Portugal, Spain and Greece identified a great number of plots in the Permanent crops farming system, while Pastures were also identified in a significant number in Greece, Romania and Estonia.

MS6.1 fig06
Figure 6

 

3. Soil types in the experimental sites

The experimental sites in Europe were mainly on Cambisols (29%), Fluvisols (17%), Luvisols (15%), Podzols (9%), Regosols (8%) and Anthrosols (6%). In China they were on Anthrosols (27%), Calcisols (23%), Phaeozems (12%), Regosols (15%), Chernozems (12%) and Acrisols (11%) (Figure 7).

MS6.1 fig07
Figure 7

4. Innovative AMPs identified in the experimental sites

The three most frequently chosen innovative AMPs in the European experimental sites were:

  • Manuring & composting (15%),
  • Crop rotation (15%) and
  • Minimum tillage (14%).

However other AMPs were also identified with some significance such as Residue Maintenance (9%), No tillage (6%), Permanent soil cover (6%), Leguminous crops (6%), Change of land use practices (10%) and Measures against compaction (6%).

In China, the most frequently chosen AMPs were

  • Manuring & composting (18%)
  • Residue maintenance/Mulching (18%)
  • Integrated pest and disease management incl. organic agriculture (12%)

MS6.1 fig08a
Figure 8a Europe
MS6.1 fig08b
Figure 8b China

 

Some of the AMPs were more commonly selected than others (Figure 9)

  • Minimum tillage was mainly present in the experimental sites in Portugal, Spain, Hungary and Estonia,
  • Crop rotation in Hungary, Spain, Poland, and Estonia 
  • Manuring & Composting was the choice in Spain, Hungary, Poland, Estonia and also China.

In contrast, Area closure /rotation grazing was only present in Romania and China (Zhifanggou) and Major change in timing of activities, only identified in China (Qiyang).

MS6.1 fig09
Figure 9

5. Soil threats

The iSQAPER teams working in the case study sites were asked to rank soil quality problems in their area according to their own expert opinion. The results show that in Europe the main soil threats can be grouped within climatic regions (Figure 10).

  • Atlantic region: Nitrate leaching, Soil-borne pests diseases and Compaction.
  • Mediterranean temperate region: Erosion, SOM decline, Compaction, Poor structure and Salinization.
  • Southern sub-continental region: Nitrate leaching, Poor water holding capacity, Poor structure and Soil-borne pests and diseases.
  • Northern Sub-continental region: Poor water holding capacity, Poor structure, Compaction, SOM decline and Salinization.

Although the experimental sites in China do not represent many of the climatic regions, it is still possible to highlight some important soil threats (Figure 11).

  • Central Asia Tropical region: Erosion, SOM decline and Poor structure. Additionally, Qiyang also shows problems with Compaction and Soil-borne pests and diseases while Suining shows also problems with Poor water holding capacity.
  • Warm temperate region (Zhifanggou): Erosion, SOM decline and Poor Structure  
  • Middle temperate zone (Gongzhuling): SOM decline.

MS6.1 fig10
Figure 10
MS6.1 fig11
Figure 11

 

 

6. Criterial for selection of experimental sites

The decisions about which plots/farms to use as sites to test the impact of promising AMPs were made by combining

  • the information about plots/farms identified by each case study site in their area using innovative AMPs with
  • the results of the visual soil soil assessments (VSA) (»Visual soil and plant quality assessment)

according to the following criteria:

  1. 2 plots using innovative AMPs were selected in each case study site area. In cases where only one soil type or one farming system was identified, only 1 plot was selected;
  2. selection always considered different innovative AMPs within the plots identified by each case study site, and in different farming systems;
  3. in case of multiple possible choices, selection favoured the most representative soil type for the case study site area (Figure 3).
  4. within the same climatic region, selection favoured the variation of innovative AMPs. This is relevant since some case study sites are located in the same climatic region.
  5. selection of innovative AMPs in each particular case study site took into consideration the plot/farm with the highest visual soil assessment (VSA) score.

7. Final selection of experimental sites

A total of 23 experimental sites were selected, from 8 different climatic regions and using 15 different innovative AMPs (and combinations of AMPs). Of these experimental sites, 15 are arable lands, 5 are permanent lands and 3 are pastures.

Table 3 Experimental sites selected in the case studies showing the climatic region, farming system, soil type, innovative AMP and the total score from the VSA

Case study site Climatic region  Plot Nº Farming system Farming system - detail Soil type  AMP Nº AMP name VSA Score
The Netherlands (1) Atlantic  1.3  Arable  Flower, fruits and vegetables Anthrosols  12 Integrated pest and disease management incl. organic agriculture 3
France (2) Atlantic 2.3 Arable Intensive pasture Anthrosols 9 Crop rotation / Control or change of species composition 1
Portugal (3)  Mediterranean temperate 3.2 Arable  Non irrigated arable land - Maize Fluvisols   8 Residue maintenance / Mulching 6
Portugal (3)  Mediterranean temperate 3.7 Permanent Vineyards  Cambisols  13 Water diversion and drainage 7
Spain (4)  Mediterranean temperate 4.2  Permanent  Fruit trees and berry plantation  Cambisols  12 Integrated pest and disease management incl. organic agriculture 6
Spain (4) Mediterranean temperate 4.8 Arable Non irrigated arable land - Cereals Regosols 1 – 8 No-till; Residue maintenance / Mulching 7
Greece (5) Mediterranean temperate 5.4 Permanent Fruit trees and berry plantation Calcisols 10 Cross-slope measure 7
Greece (5) Mediterranean temperate 5.12 Pasture Intensive Cambisols 18 Change of land use practices / intensity level 5
Slovenia (6) Southern sub-continental 6.3 Arable Non irrigated arable land - Cereals; Maize; Legumes; Fodder crops; Root crops Fluvisols 9 Crop rotation / Control or change of species composition 0
Slovenia (6) Southern sub-continental 6.9 Arable Non irrigated arable land - Maize; Legumes; Fodder crops; Root crops Cambisols 9 Crop rotation / Control or change of species composition 2
Hungary (7) Southern sub-continental 7.1 Permanent  Vineyards Cambisols 5 - 8 Leguminous crop; Residue maintenance / Mulching 8
Hungary (7) Southern sub-continental 7.5 Arable Non irrigated arable land - Cereals; Maize; Oil crops Luvisols 2-8-9-11 Min-till; Residue maintenance / Mulching; Crop rotation / Control or change of species composition; Measures against compaction 3
Romania (8) Southern sub-continental  8.2 Arable Non irrigated arable land - Legumes Fluvisols 5 Leguminous crops 11
Romania (8) Southern sub-continental 8.11 Pasture Extensive Chernozems 18 Change of land use practices / intensity level 2
Poland (9) Northen sub-continental 9.1 Arable Non irrigated arable land - Maize Podzols 7 Manuring & composting 10
Poland (9) Southern sub-continental 9.5 Permanent Fruit trees and berry plantation Luvisols 12 Integrated pest and disease management incl. organic agriculture 5
Estonia (10) Boreal to sub-boreal 10.12 Pasture Intensive Histosols 3 Permanent soil cover / Removing less vegetation cover 5
Estonia (10) Boreal to sub-boreal 10.14 Arable Non-irrigated land - Cereals Luvisols 1-9 No-till; Crop rotation / Control or change of species composition 3
China - Qiyang (11) Central Asia tropical 11.4 Arable   Acrisols 6 Green manure / Integrated soil fertility management 5
China - Suining (12) Central Asia tropical 12.1 Arable Non irrigated arable land - Maize Anthrosols 8 Residue maintenance / Mulching 5
China - Zhifanggou (13) Cold semi-arid climate 13.6 Arable Non irrigated arable land - Cereals Calcisols 8 Residue maintenance / Mulching 12
China - Gongzhuling (14) Middle Temperate 14.1 Arable Permanently irrigated land - Maize Phaeozems 8 Residue maintenance / Mulching 3
China - Gongzhuling (14) Middle Temperate 14.4 Arable Permanently irrigated land - Maize Chernozems 8-14 Residue maintenance / Mulching; Irrigation management 3
Go To Top